Abstract
ObjectivesTo compare pelvic cavities in australopithecines, modern humans and non-hominid primates in order to discuss the obstetrical mechanisms in australopithecines Material and methodsBony pelves from fossil material (Australopithecus afarensis AL 288-1, Australopithecus africanus Sts14, Australopithecus Stw 431 and Mh2), 133 modern humans (82 adult females and 51 adult males) and 67 anthropoid primates (36 gorilla, 26 Pan troglodytes, 5 Pongo pygmaeus) were reconstructed and compared (shape and morphometric analysis) using 16 pelvimetric mesasurements. ResultsPelves of australopithecines were characterized by lower anteroposterior (AP) and transverse (TRV) diameters in inlet pelvis than in other species. Index (AP/TRV) of pelvic inlet, midpelvis and pelvic outlet in the australopithecines were the lowest (<100) and the pelvic shape was platypelloid. A logarithmic factorial analysis showed that the pelvic morphology of australopithecines was different from humans and non-hominid primates but nearer the humans. Discussion and conclusionIn contrast with apes where obstetrical mechanics seem to be easier, and because of platypelloidy, mechanism of birth in australopithecines was as difficult as in modern homo sapiens. Birth without cesarean was probably possible in an asynclitic TRV orientation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
