Abstract
This scientific research article covers the evidence in all its theoretical, doctrinal context and the main errors that a criminal court can commit when evaluating the evidentiary elements in a trial hearing, same errors that agree with each one of the analysis of the evidence separately and together as indicated by the current Ecuadorian criminal norm. In the same way, a theory attached to the law is proposed to try to correct these errors and they are less and less in Criminal Law. In the same way, it is about impacting the reader with a purely theoretical and doctrinal study regarding how to appreciate those evidentiary elements as a whole, according to significant appreciation or valuation mechanisms, mentioned by some national and international authors, who present a different idea about valuation schemes throughout South America and throughout the world. Taking into account many doctrinal theories, relieving the European ones such as the German and Spanish.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
