Abstract
This paper aims to defend the unitarian position of Plato’s thought through an analysis of the Sophist in its relation with other middle and late dialogues. Contrary to those who consider that koinonia is an exclusive philosophical motif of the late period and represents a break with the dialogues of the intermediate period, the text seeks to defend how koinonia in the Sophist is not a rupture but a development and a consummation of Platonic positions sustained since the middle dialogues.
Highlights
La publicación de The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato[1] (1867) de Lewis Campbell provocó un viraje enorme en los estudios platónicos
Palabras clave: Platón; koinonía; teoría de las ideas; Sofista; Fedón Abstract: This paper aims to defend the unitarian position of Plato’s thought through an analysis of the Sophist in its relation with other middle and late dialogues
Contrary to those who consider that koinonia is an exclusive philosophical motif of the late period and represents a break with the dialogues of the intermediate period, the text seeks to defend how koinonia in the Sophist is not a rupture but a development and a consummation of Platonic positions sustained since the middle dialogues
Summary
La publicación de The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato[1] (1867) de Lewis Campbell provocó un viraje enorme en los estudios platónicos.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
