Abstract

The jurisdictional protection of the Constitution is designed to guaranty the affectivity of the legal state in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The fulfillment of this requirement has passed through the establishment of the constitutional Court which received from the Constitution the main competence of knowing the requests related to the conformity of the public authorities’ acts to the Constitution. This paper has tried to determine the effective sweep of this protection by making a criticism-analysis of its juridical base with regard to the judgment of the constitutional Court delivered under R. Const. 0038. By this judgment, the constitutional Court extended its competence to the act that normally should not be submitted to its appreciation. This extension was justified by the need of protecting the human rights and the public liberties furthered in the Constitution. However, it is important to insert in the Constitution this new competence in order to protect the constitutional principles as well as the human rights and the public liberties.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call