Abstract
The Marxist tradition, with very few exceptions, always claimed that Marx’s method was dialectical and even thought that his work inaugurated a new philosophical school called “dialectical materialism”. Currently, with some academic serenity, we must conclude that his method is not dialectical. In this article we present two texts of Marx that are crucial for this discussion. Both were used by the Marxist tradition to enthrone dialectics. However this was caused by a bad interpretation of both texts.
Highlights
The Marxist tradition, with very few exceptions, always claimed that Marx’s method was dialectical and even thought that his work inaugurated a new philosophical school called “dialectical materialism”
En este artículo presentamos dos textos de Marx cruciales para esta discusión
With some academic serenity, we must conclude that his method is not dialectical
Summary
Con muy contadas excepciones, afirmó siempre que el método de Marx era dialéctico e incluso se consideró que su obra inauguraba una nueva escuela filosófica a la que se llamó “materialismo dialéctico”. Actualmente, con un poco de serenidad académica, hay que concluir que no es así. En este artículo presentamos dos textos de Marx cruciales para esta discusión. Ambos fueron utilizados por el marxismo para entronizar la dialéctica. En ambos casos se trataba de un error de interpretación[1].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
