Abstract

Flexible ureteroscopy is now widely used as the preferred option to surgically treat a urinary stone, due to several technological advancements. Thus, choosing the adequate equipment is challenging, but respect safety concepts. Indeed, placing the safety wire (nitinol, 0,035’’, « stiff ») under rigid cystoscopy is not mandatory but improve safety. Regarding ureteral access sheath (UAS), considerations are similar : UAS facilitates vision, pressure and temperature control but can also be responsible of ureteral injuries at insertion. Suction devices are now undervaluation and could not be discussed. To limit the barotrauma risk, irrigation devices with manual pumps should be used (40cmH20). Choosing a flexible ureteroscope (fURS) is challenging; a special attention has to be given to size, deflexion, working channel position and vision. Thus, using a single fURS is hardly imaginable. Both Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet(Ho:YAG) et Thulium Fiber (TFL) lasers are recommended to treat urinary stones during fURS, with a potential advantage of TFL on thin pulverization. A wide variety of baskets exists and size and shape have to be considered before acquisition. Finally, if ureteral stenting is not mandatory in uncomplicated cases, silicone stents present a lower risk of encrustation and stent-related symptoms compared to polyurethane ones.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call