Abstract

Evidences in Legal Question Answering (LQA) help infer accurate answers. Current sentence-level evidence extraction based methods may lose the discourse coherence of legal articles since they tend to make the extracted sentences scattered over an article. To this end, this paper proposes a cascaded key segment learning enhanced framework for $${\textbf {L}}$$ ong $${\textbf {L}}$$ egal article $${\textbf {Q}}$$ uestion $${\textbf {A}}$$ nswering, namely $${\textbf {L2QA}}$$ . The framework consists of three cascaded modules: Sifter, Reader, and Responder, which first transfers a long legal article into segments and each segment is inherent in the discourse coherence from consecutive sentences. And then, the Sifter is trained by automatically sifting out key segments in an iterative answer-guided coarse-to-fine way. The Reader utilizes a range of co-attention and self-attention mechanisms to obtain the semantic representations of the question and key segments. Finally, the Responder predicts final answers in a cascaded manner, identifying where the answer is located. Conducted on CAIL 2021 Law MRC dataset, our L2QA achieves 83.1 Macro-F1 and 65.8 EM and outperforms a state-of-the-art legal QA model by 4.1% and 9.1%.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.