Abstract

This paper presents part of the results of a learner corpus study of English spoken and written performances by Japanese native speakers. For the current study, the written data from 80 participants were used. Their English written production was examined based on Processability Theory (PT; Pienemann, 1998, 2005; Bettoni & Di Biase, 2015) as well as on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR; Council of Europe, 2001). Results demonstrated that there was an implicational pattern in the acquisition of English L2 grammar by the Japanese learners as predicted in PT. It was also shown that there was a linear connection between second language (L2) development as found in PT analysis and L2 proficiency levels as measured by the CEFR rating, while a statistically significant difference was not found.

Highlights

  • The present study aims to investigate empirically second language (L2) learners’ written production using two different approaches

  • 5.1 Processability Theory (PT) Stages for English L2 Syntax Table 2 presents the results of the PT analysis for developmental stages for English L2 syntax found in the written production by 80 Japanese learners

  • It can be argued that the acquisition of English syntax found in the written production by Japanese learners follows the developmental sequence as predicted in the LMH in PT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study aims to investigate empirically second language (L2) learners’ written production using two different approaches. Processability Theory (PT; Pienemann, 1998; Pienemann, Di Biase, & Kawaguchi, 2005), a major theory of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), is used to analyze the participants’ use of L2 grammatical structures. Their overall written performances were measured by the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR; Council of Europe, 2001). In 2005, PT proposed the new hypotheses regarding the acquisition of syntactic structures (Pienemann, Di Biase, & Kawaguchi, 2015) in accordance with the development of LFG

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.