Abstract
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health challenge. Use of automated external defibrillators (AED) by laypersons improves survival of patient's victim of OHCA. The aim of our study was to compare onsite AED vs. dispatched AED management of cardiac arrest occurring in international airports.We conducted a retrospective, observational, comparative, study on data collected from three international airports: Paris-Charles-de-Gaulle (CDG), Chicago and Madrid-Barajas. We included patients with OHCA occurring inside the airport between 2009 and 2013. Group public access (PUB) included airports where AED were available to laypersons and group dispatched (SEC) was represented by Paris-CDG airport where AED was provided by paramedic teams. The primary endpoint was successful resuscitation defined as survival at time of hospital admission.We included 150 consecutive patients victim of OHCA in the three airports. The time between collapse and AED setting was significantly shorter in the PUB vs. SEC group (4±3minutes vs. 11±11, P=0.0006). The total duration of resuscitation was shorter in the PUB group (10±10minutes vs. 36±25minutes, P<0.0001). Survival at time of hospital admission was higher in the PUB group (62% vs. 38%, P=0.01).The availability of public access AEDs in international airports seems to allow a quicker defibrillation and an increased success rate of resuscitation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
