Abstract

It has generally been assumed that Burgundian compiler Jean Mansel borrowed the history of the kings of France included in his Fleur des histoires from the Grandes Chroniques de France, the most widely circulated French historiographical work at the time. The present paper challenges this assumption, focusing the attention on a particular segment of Mansel’s Fleur in its short redaction. Extant in five manuscripts, this section covers the history of the French kings from Charlemagne to Charles VI. A comparison of Mansel’s text with that of the Chronique de France jusque 1380 discloses the striking similarities of the two works in their recounting of the history of the kings of France. It appears that both authors are not dependent on the Grande Chroniques as much as they are indebted to an already reworked and rewritten redaction of this work. Indeed, Jean Mansel and the author of the Chronique jusque 1380 provide a history of the French sovereigns which comes from the Abrégé Paulin Paris. Lexical and stylistic resemblance between Mansel’s Fleur and the Chronique jusque 1380 indicates both authors mined an intermediate, unidentified text based on the Abrégé; chronology in the composition of the two works and divergent choices in the selection of episodes recounted assure that the authors worked independently from one another.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.