Abstract
The relevance of mediation in social science is that it questions the relationship between principles of collective action and the role of objects. The example of the history of art shows how an analysis can emphasize the opacity of mediators, without making of them the vectors of an overhanging cause, the instruments of goals or of external reasons. The restitution of necessary intermediaries of art, started as a critical denunciation of the relationship between aesthetic subjects and objects by social history, or of the erudite accumulation by the history of art, has converged towards the idea of a collective production of the world of art by its actors. An analysis must therefore consider the same mediations, from humans and institutions to frameworks of perception, to material elements, and even the finest details of art works and their production. It is thereby able to close the disastrous gap that has separated social analyses of the conditions of art and aesthetic or semiotic analyses of the "works themselves".
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.