L’accouchement des femmes enceintes de jumeaux : les enseignements de l’étude nationale observationnelle prospective comparative JUMODA

Abstract

ObjectivesTo summerize the results of the JUMODA study (JUmeaux MODe d’Accouchement) on the planned mode of delivery of twin pregnancy and the management of second twin delivery. MethodsJUMODA was a national observational prospective comparative study that took place between february 2014 and march 2015 in 176 french maternity units performing more than 1500 deliveries per year. Its main objectives were the comparison of neonatal and maternal morbidity according to the planned mode of delivery and the determination of the managements of second twin delivery associated with the best neonatal outcomes. To control for potential confounding factors and indication biases, statistical analyses comprized multivariate logistic regressions and matching on propensity scores. ResultsThe JUMODA study recruited 8823 women with twin delivery at or beyond 22 weeks of gestation. For twin pregnancies with a cephalic first twin at 32 weeks of gestation and beyond, severe neonatal morbidity was higher in the planned cesarean (150/2908 (5.2 %) than in the planned vaginal delivery group (199/8922 (2.2 %), aOR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.19-2.04). Increased neonatal morbidity in the planned cesarean delivery group was explained by higher severe morbidity in neonates born preterm (aOR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.13-2.39, for deliveries between 32+0 and 34+6 weeks of gestation, aOR 2.04, 95 % CI 1.22-3.41, for deliveries between 35+0 SA and 36+6 weeks of gestation) but not in neonates born at term (aOR 1.19, 95 % CI 0.58-2.44). In comparison with planned cesarean delivery, planned vaginal delivery was not associated with increased severe neonatal morbidity in case of breech presenting first twin after 32 weeks of gestation or with decreased survival witout severe neonatal morbidity in case of delivery before 32 weeks of gestation whatever the first twin presentation. In comparison with planned vaginal delivery, planned cesarean delivery was associated with increased severe maternal morbidity only in women aged 35 and higher. Delivery of non cephalic second twin was associated with similar severe neonatal morbidity rate than delivery of cephalic second twin. Finally, in case of cephalic second twin, internal version followed by total breech extraction was associated with less cesarean for the second twin but with higher severe neonatal morbidity in case of preterm birth in comparison with pushing efforts, ocytocin perfusion and artificial rupture of membranes. ConclusionsPlanned vaginal delivery is the planned mode of delivery to encourage for the majority of pregnant women with twins, whatever first twin presentation and gestational age at delivery. No management of cephalic second twin appears better than an other, its choice will rest on obstetrician preferences.