Abstract
It is argued that, though the discovery of the ‘God spot’ adds to the analogy between sensory perception and religious experience, it is of no avail in establishing the reliability of religious experience, because the main difference between sensory perception and religious experience (i.e., that sensory perception can be ‘calibrated’ while religious experience cannot) remains unchanged. He also argues that religious experience is much more central to Reformed Epistemology than Van Woudenberg and Blaauw admit, because – as Alvin Plantinga has shown – religious propositions that are properly basic in a strict sense mostly are reports of religious experiences.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have