Abstract
The concept of legal pluralism is associated with the phenomenon of multicentrism, polycentrism and international dialogue taking place between courts. Its popularity in the European context is justified by the need to conceptualize the changes occurring in Europe within the ongoing process of European integration. The law and the resulting rules of recognition, as well as the conflict rules that coexist and are jointly applied, which constitute the essence of the definition of legal pluralism, can be tools shaping the functioning of the regulatory environment for economic activity and the functioning of society in times of crisis. Within the European constitutional area, there are still a number of inconsistent rules of recognition. However, in the case of a real conflict between a national constitutional norm and a norm of EU law, Member States try to adapt their constitutions to the normative standard set by the European Union or applying a pro-EU interpretation, thereby recognizing the existence and binding nature of a multi-component, multicentric legal system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio G (Ius)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.