Abstract

The right to freely decide on the conclusion or dissolution of marriage traditionally falls into the corpus of human and civil rights which are guaranteed both at the international and the national level. In Serbian legislation, the implications of being deprived of this right, particularly as a result of coercion or duress, are two-fold: in the sphere of civil law, it is one of the legal grounds for voidability of marriage (Art. 38 of the Family Act) while, in the field of criminal law, it is qualified as a special criminal offence of forced marriage (Art. 187a of the Criminal Code). The initial text of the Criminal Code did not contain the incrimination of forced marriage, it was introduced by novelties in 2016, during the process of harmonising domestic legislation with the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (the Istanbul Convention), which was signed and ratified by the Republic of Serbia. Thus, Serbia assumed an obligation to adjust and enhance its system for the protection of victims of violence. The author in this paper seeks to examine the criminal protection from forced marriage in its historical vertical, analyzing earlier criminal-law responses to this phenomenon, critically considering the capacities of positive law, but also dealing with possible directions for its further development.

Highlights

  • КРИ­ВИЧ­НО ДЕ­ЛО ПРИ­НУД­НОГ ЗА­КЉУ­ЧЕ­ЊА БРА­КА У ПРА­ВУ СР­БИ­ЈЕ

  • При­нуд­но за­кљу­че­ње бра­ка има и при­ви­ле­го­ва­ни об­лик, ко­ји на­ста­је ка­да учи­ни­лац дру­го ли­це од­ве­де у ино­стран­ство ра­ди за­кљу­че­ња при­нуд­ног бра­ка, или ка­да га у истом ци­љу на­ве­де да оде у ино­стран­ство

Read more

Summary

Introduction

КРИ­ВИЧ­НО ДЕ­ЛО ПРИ­НУД­НОГ ЗА­КЉУ­ЧЕ­ЊА БРА­КА У ПРА­ВУ СР­БИ­ЈЕ Го­ди­не, у ве­ли­кој ме­ри је пред­ста­вљао дис­кон­ти­ну­и­тет у од­но­су на ра­ни­је пра­во, а ка­ко је усво­јио мно­га за оно до­ба про­гре­сив­на ре­ше­ња, ње­го­во до­но­ше­ње се с пра­вом мо­же сма­тра­ти пре­лом­ним мо­мен­том у раз­во­ју кри­вич­ног пра­ва Ср­би­је.[32] Ка­да је при­нуд­но за­кљу­че­ње бра­ка у пи­та­њу, За­ко­ник не­ма та­ко ре­во­лу­ци­о­нар­ни зна­чај, већ ма­ње-ви­ше пра­ти исту раз­вој­ну ли­ни­ју.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.