Abstract

Ionospheric delay effect is a critical issue that limits the accuracy of precise Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning and navigation for single-frequency users, especially in mid- and low-latitude regions where variations in the ionosphere are larger. Kriging spatial interpolation techniques have been recently introduced to model the spatial correlation and variability of ionosphere, which intrinsically assume that the ionosphere field is stochastically stationary but does not take the random observational errors into account. In this paper, by treating the spatial statistical information on ionosphere as prior knowledge and based on Total Electron Content (TEC) semivariogram analysis, we use Kriging techniques to spatially interpolate TEC values. By assuming that the stochastic models of both the ionospheric signals and measurement errors are only known up to some unknown factors, we propose a new Kriging spatial interpolation method with unknown variance components for both the signals of ionosphere and TEC measurements. Variance component estimation has been integrated with Kriging to reconstruct regional ionospheric delays. The method has been applied to data from the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) and compared with the ordinary Kriging and polynomial interpolations with spherical cap harmonic functions, polynomial functions and low-degree spherical harmonic functions. The statistics of results indicate that the daily ionospheric variations during the experimental period characterized by the proposed approach have good agreement with the other methods, ranging from 10 to 80 TEC Unit (TECU, 1 TECU = 1 × 1016 electrons/m2) with an overall mean of 28.2 TECU. The proposed method can produce more appropriate estimations whose general TEC level is as smooth as the ordinary Kriging but with a smaller standard deviation around 3 TECU than others. The residual results show that the interpolation precision of the new proposed method is better than the ordinary Kriging and polynomial interpolation by about 1.2 TECU and 0.7 TECU, respectively. The root mean squared error of the proposed new Kriging with variance components is within 1.5 TECU and is smaller than those from other methods under comparison by about 1 TECU. When compared with ionospheric grid points, the mean squared error of the proposed method is within 6 TECU and smaller than Kriging, indicating that the proposed method can produce more accurate ionospheric delays and better estimation accuracy over China regional area.

Highlights

  • The ionosphere is the upper part of atmosphere located between from 50 km to 1300 km above the Earth’s surface

  • The results have shown that the Root Mean Squared error (RMS) of the UPC Kriging Global Ionospheric Map (GIM) is about 16%

  • Due to the variation level of ionospheric activity which calls for a change for the degree of the ionosphere measurements correlation, the experimental semivariograms have to be fitted in real-time with the IPPs located within appropriate searching limits, with the distance interval to compute the semivariogram from data and its tolerance set to 100 km and 50 km, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ionosphere is the upper part of atmosphere located between from 50 km to 1300 km above the Earth’s surface. 0.1 TECU (3%) over the current UPC GIM products when compared with TOPEX/Poseidon and JASON TEC data, respectively [21] These studies have shown that the Kriging method is useful and effective for ionospheric TEC estimation. As the first motivation of this paper, we will consider the estimation of ionospheric delays with TEC measurements of different (unknown) accuracy. The second motivation of this paper is to apply the new Kriging method to real data and to demonstrate how to eliminate the distortion by calibrating stochastic models of measurements and signals. Kriging methods to the case in which the stochastic model of measurements contains a number of unknown variance components.

The Principle of Kriging Spatial Interpolation
Construction of Semivariogram
Experimental
Regional Ionospheric Models
Applications to CMONOC Data and Result Analysis
TEC Maps
80 TECU during the VTEC session from
18.3 TECU and are than those of KVCE andKVCE
Figures interpolation for to
Figures and
TEC RMS Maps
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call