Abstract
AbstractSystems engineers often do not have a way to systematically apply historical “lessons‐learned’ in their day‐to‐day activities, especially when applied to non‐traditional areas of engineering management. Risk analysis has become the standard systems engineering decision‐making tool to evaluate uncertainties in cost, schedule and performance. Therefore, such historical insights need to be modeled within that framework to be mutually comprehensible and useful to both historians and systems engineers. To demonstrate this framework, I examine historical “lessons‐learned” in several relevant areas: the implications of operational flexibility on system design; complex system‐accident theory; and the considerations of technological “reverse salients”. The insights developed through historical analyses can be used as a decision‐making tool for systems engineers, by developing a subjective “risk rating” assessment as a part of the overall set of decision aids to estimate uncertainty in performance, cost and schedule. This interface between historical insights and the priorities of systems engineers can enrich the basis of programmatic decision‐making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.