Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to explore the changes that four Korean university students made in their regulation of cognition during reading processes. The students were trained using explicit reading strategy instruction based on the CALLA model. To this end, first, metacognition was framed and categorized by the definition from Baker and Brown (1984) and, second, a scoring scale for measuring the readers’ regulation of cognition was developed based on the study by Block (1992) to examine and trace any changes in their regulation processes. For data analyses, the participants’ think-aloud protocols were used. The results indicate that there were marked changes in the frequencies of their regulation processes over time. Specifically, the students’ overt strategic and regulatory behaviors in a regulation process showed more flexibility and organization toward the end of the strategy training. This study suggests that students would benefit from being provided with sufficient time for practice in order to build effective regulation of cognition in reading processes and that the teacher should understand the complex nature of the regulation processes that students go through. In addition, think-aloud procedures as an instructional tool for effective strategy training was shown to be a worthwhile technique in the classroom.

Highlights

  • Strategy intervention studies have contributed to revealing the effectiveness of such training on successful reading through improving metacognition (Aghaie & Zhang, 2012; Auerbach & Paxton, 1997; Dhieb-Henia, 2003; Dreyer & Nel, 2003; Kim & Cha, 2014; Macaro & Erler, 2008)

  • The primary goal of this study was to explore the changes that four Korean university students made in their regulation of cognition during reading processes

  • This study suggests that students would benefit from being provided with sufficient time for practice in order to build effective regulation of cognition in reading processes and that the teacher should understand the complex nature of the regulation processes that students go through

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Strategy intervention studies have contributed to revealing the effectiveness of such training on successful reading through improving metacognition (Aghaie & Zhang, 2012; Auerbach & Paxton, 1997; Dhieb-Henia, 2003; Dreyer & Nel, 2003; Kim & Cha, 2014; Macaro & Erler, 2008). Amid the plethora of definitions of metacognition that do not clearly distinguish between the mental activities and overt motor behaviors as identified by Dörnyei and Skehan (2003), Baker and Brown (1984) defined metacognition as consisting of two constructs—knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition They explained that the first one involves a reader’s knowledge about cognitive resources, compatibility, and learning situation, and it corresponds to mental activities; while the other encompasses self-regulatory mechanisms which are used to solve ongoing problems and is related to overt motor behaviors. Her study indicates a student’s proficiency level significantly matters in terms of the quality of regulation processes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call