Abstract
This research analyzes whether the sole proprietorship policy can support national banking monitoring andhow this policy is implemented in the banking globalization, legal protection for national banking and concept of national banking development in globalization era in relation to the objectives of welfare state. The research uses normative juridical method with descriptive analysis. The findings are: first, the sole proprietorship policy does not apply to under 25% shareholding of a bank or share acquisitions in several banks. Second, the nature of sole proprietorship policy is futuristic, so it can reduce the discretion for national banking shareholding by foreign/global investors. Third, legal protections for national banking towards domination of national banking shareholding have been ineffective because the sole proprietorship policy only incorporates the same proprietorship of several banks. Fourth, in globalization era, the concept of national banking regulation independency for capital is adjusted to the business segment of each bank. In addition, an integrative monitoring should be applied to national banking activities, particularly to foreign parties who hold shares in several national banks without highly influenced by global banking regulation recommendation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.