Abstract

This article explains the comparison of maqashid al-shari'ah thinking between al-Ghazali and al-Syathibi. The purpose and core of all Islamic teachings (Qur'an and hadith) is benefit. The need to prioritize the benefit of religious texts and ijma in the Muamalah region and adat if there is a contradiction between the two. Benefits prepared by humans must be included in the benefit of the text if there is a contradiction between the two. Both of them also agreed that the benefit was intended, the essence returned to the protection of humans themselves, but according to al-Thufi maslahah is the most authoritative independent proposition to determine legal policy. Benefit is not an authoritative proposition to determine legal policy. Benefit is not a legal proposition, but as the core and purpose of a law. According to him all the Islamic Shari'ah teachings have a causal relationship (muamalah) with benefit in the customary territory and muamalah. Intellect (intellect) of normal human beings can also know and find benefit in the area of muamalah and adat (tradition) not in the area of worship

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.