Abstract
Although the Corruption Act has been specific, but its punishment system not constructed from its basic concept, that is the concept of authority. As a result, a lot of things that are paradoxical and contradictory in its substance; particularly in the construction of its criminal elements. This study departs from the belief that this problem will be solved if the system is reconstructed with reference to the concept of punishment authority as its "raw material". By dissecting the concept of authority with progressive fiqh approach that utilizes social sciences, and by using the technique of philosophical analysis of normative-prescriptive, came to the conclusion that the system of corruption punishment should refer to the status of legal subjects who holds the authority, not the aspect of state losses as Corruption Act at this time.
Highlights
The Corruption Act has been specific, but its punishment system not constructed from its basic concept, that is the concept of authority
This study departs from the belief that this problem will be solved if the system is reconstructed with reference to the concept of punishment authority as its "raw material"
By dissecting the concept of authority with progressive fiqh approach that utilizes social sciences, and by using the technique of philosophical analysis of normativeprescriptive, came to the conclusion that the system of corruption punishment should refer to the status of legal subjects who holds the authority, not the aspect of state losses as Corruption Act at this time
Summary
Meski UU Tindak Pidana Korupsi telah berdiri sendiri, tetapi sistem hukumannya tidak dikonstruk dari konsep dasarnya yaitu konsep kewenangan. Akibatnya banyak hal yang paradoks dan kontradiktif dalam substansinya; khususnya dalam konstruksi unsur-unsur pidananya. Kajian ini berangkat dari keyakinan bahwa masalah ini akan teratasi jika sistem hukuman direkonstruksi dengan mengacu konsep kewenangan sebagai “bahan baku”-nya. Dengan membedah konsep kewenangan dengan pendekatan fiqh progresif yang memanfaatkan ilmu-ilmu sosial, dan dengan menggunakan teknik analisis normatiffilosofis yang bersifat preskriptif, sampai pada kesimpulan bahwa sistem hukuman tipikor harus mengacu pada status subyek hukum yang memegang kewenangan, bukan pada aspek kerugian negara sebagaimana UU Tipikor saat ini
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.