Abstract

On the basis of analysis of the transformations occurring in Russia following the collapse of Communism, the Author proposes a research hypothesis in terms of three statements. Firstly, Russia is creating the foundations for the development of a market economy, yet this process is hardly dynamic and has not involved all the branches of the economy. Secondly, there are no symptoms to demonstrate that a civic society is emerging in Russia, with tradition playing a significant role in how the relations between the elements and social institutions are perceived. Thirdly, the Kremlin’s foreign policy is not clearly formulated, and no transparent strategy or clear objectives have been worked out.

Highlights

  • Emerging in Russia, with tradition playing a significant role in how the relations between the elements and social institutions are perceived

  • On the basis of analysis of the transformations occurring in Russia following the collapse of Communism, the Author proposes a research hypothesis in terms of three statements

  • Russia is creating the foundations for the development of a market economy, yet this process is hardly dynamic and has not involved all the branches of the economy

Read more

Summary

Wojciech STANKIEWICZ

Rosja jest pañstwem o bogatej historii i ró¿norodnej kulturze[1]. ZSRR, stosuj1c terror pañstwowy, neutralizowa[3] wszelkie niepokoje i konflikty spo3eczne. Stosuj1c demokratyczne metody negocjacji, niemo¿liwe jest pogodzenie interesów poszczególnych narodów zamieszkuj1cych obszar by3ego ZSSR. W Rosji istotne znaczenie odgrywa wielowiekowa tradycja – wykorzystana w odpowiedni sposób, mo¿e pos3u¿yæ jako narzêdzie zmian w gospodarce i polityce b1dŸ odwrotnie – mo¿e przyczyniæ siê do umocnienia ortodoksyjnoœci spo3eczeñstwa, hamuj1c rozwój cywilizacyjny na wiele lat. Rosj[1] przez wieki rz1dzono z centralnego oœrodka w3adzy. Wielokrotnie próbowano poprawiæ sposób sprawowania rz1dów poprzez wzmocnienie w3adzy centralnej. Trudne jest wypracowanie odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy Rosjanie – wyró¿niaj1c siê dotychczas zbiorow[1] biernoœci1 – s1 w stanie sprostaæ wymaganiom w3aœciwym dla spo3eczeñstwa obywatelskiego?. Hipotez[1] badawcz[1] niniejszego studium s1 nastêpuj1ce twierdzenia:

Wojciech Stankiewicz
Summary

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.