Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of role conflict and audit experience on audit judgment and skepticism of the professionalism of public accountants as mediating variables. This research is an explanatory research with a quantitative approach. Data was collected using a questionnaire to 47 KAPs in the city of Surabaya. Sampling was done by purposive sampling, then analyzed using path analysis and Sobel test. The results of the study explain that role conflict has a negative effect, while audit experience has a positive effect on audit judgment. On the indirect effect, it is known that role conflict also has a negative effect and experience has a positive effect on audit judgment through professional skepticism from public accountants in Surabaya.
 Keywords: Role Conflict; Audit Experience; Professional Skepticism; Audit Judgment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
