Abstract

The article contains a Czech translation of the Letter to the Diocese in Caesarea (Epistula ad Caesarienses) written by Eusebius of Caesarea in 325 from Nicaea, after the Nicene Creed was adopted by the council. It consequently focuses on Eusebius' comments on the Nicene Creed, in which Eusebius draws attention to the new terminology of the Nicene Creed and attempts to expound it within his own theological position. Two of these new terms, the expressions from the substance of the Father and homousios with the Father, would seem to be particularly puzzling. Eusebius provides explanations in the letter of the two expressions at the expense of reduction or rejection of their usia part. From the substance of the Father is a phrase which according to Eusebius means nothing more than that the Son is from the Father. The uniqueness of the Son's birth before all ages is expressed by Eusebius with additional terms. Homousios is expounded as a word implying the most exact likeness between the Son and the Father. This is the usual way used by Eusebius to explain the quality of the relationship between the Father and the Son in his other writings. For Eusebius the Nicene Creed is an anti-Arian creed including those terms for which satisfactory explanations cannot be found in his own teachings (which remained unchanged both during and after the Council of Nicaea), nor in the teachings of other participants in the council (or at least Eusebius does not suggest this in his letter).

Highlights

  • Ten v dopise De decretis Nicaenae synodi tvrdí, že biskupové při jednání Níkajského sněmu proti eusebianům, kteří prosazovali formulaci z Boha, navrhli z podstaty Otce, aby odmítli tvrzení, že Syn je z Boha jako vše stvoření je z Boha, a aby podtrhli Synovu odlišnost od stvoření a jeho jedi‐ nečný původ v Otci; srov

  • The article contains a Czech translation of the Letter to the Diocese in Caesarea (Epistula ad Caesarienses) written by Eusebius of Caesarea in 325 from Nicaea, after the Nicene Creed was adopted by the council

  • Homousios is expounded as a word implying the most exact likeness between the Son and the Father

Read more

Summary

Eusebiova role na sněmu v Níkaii

V úvodu Dopisu Kaisarejským (Ep. ad Caesar.) Eusebios cituje vlast‐ ní vyznání víry, které doplňuje ujištěním o tom, že svou víru přijal od svých předchůdců v biskupském úřadě a že jeho přesvědčení je trvalé a neměnné. Dopis antiochejské synody biskupu Alexandrovi ze Soluně, Urkunde 18 (Atha‐ nasius Werke III,[1,1,2,36,37,38,39,40,41]). K synodě i k dopisu antiochejské synody srov. Tetz, „Zur strittigen Frage arianischer Glaubenserklärung auf dem Konzil von před koncilem v Níkaii správná, pak Eusebios nevystoupil na Níkajském sněmu jako jeden z významných účastníků sněmu, jak se soudilo dříve, ale proto, aby obhájil svou pravověrnost

Východisko Eusebiových komentářů: dvě kréda
Z podstaty Otce
Pravý Bůh z pravého Boha
Homoúsios
Níkajská anathemata
10. Z jiné hypostaze či podstaty
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call