Abstract

BackgroundDespite evidence of the positive impact of routine assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), their systematic collection is not widely implemented in cancer care.AimTo assess the knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards PROMs and electronically collected PROMs (ePROMs) in clinical practice and research and to explore respondent-related factors associated with the above dimensions.MethodAn ad hoc developed online survey was administered to all HCPs employed in clinical activity in an Italian comprehensive cancer center. The survey investigated which PROMs were known and used, as well as HCPs’ opinions on the advantages and drawbacks of routine PROM assessment, including electronic assessment (ePROM). Linear and logistic regression models were used for association analyses.ResultsFive Hundred Eleven of nine hundred ninety-two invited HCPs (52%) provided analyzable responses. 68% were women, 46% were nurses and 42% physicians, and 52.5% had > 20 years seniority. The average number of PROMs known was six among 17 proposed. All proved to be under-used (< 28%) except unidimensional and multidimensional pain scales (77 and 36%). Respondents expressed an overall positive attitude towards PROMs, with strengths outweighing weaknesses (mean overall scores 3.6 and 2.9, respectively, on a 1–5 scale). 67% of respondents preferred electronic collection over paper and pencil. Profession was associated with knowledge and use (physicians reported knowing more PROMs than other professionals) and with a preference for electronic collection (nurses were less likely to prefer the electronic format than physicians). Senior HCPs were slightly more critical about both PROMs and electronic administration.ConclusionsThis survey indicates an acceptable level of knowledge of common PROM tools but low usage in practice. Based on the generally positive attitude of HCPs, routine implementation of ePROMs can be promoted as long as adequate resources and training are provided.Trial registrationNot registered.

Highlights

  • Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized questionnaires completed by patients

  • Profession was associated with knowledge and use and with a preference for electronic collection

  • Senior healthcare professionals (HCPs) were slightly more critical about both patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and electronic administration. This survey indicates an acceptable level of knowledge of common PROM tools but low usage in practice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized questionnaires completed by patients. Their purpose is to assess patients’ perception of a variety of health and well-being indicators that provide important information to healthcare professionals (HCPs) for patient care. PROMs have been advocated for use in routine cancer care for some time [1] and there is evidence that they may improve symptom control, patient well-being, cost effectiveness, patient engagement and survival [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Systematic PROM collection is not widely implemented in routine oncology practice for individual patient care [15,16,17]. Despite evidence of the positive impact of routine assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), their systematic collection is not widely implemented in cancer care

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call