Abstract

BackgroundDespite the considerable and growing body of knowledge translation (KT) literature, there are few methodologies sufficiently detailed to guide an integrated KT research approach for a population health study. This paper argues for a clearly articulated collaborative KT approach to be embedded within the research design from the outset.DiscussionPopulation health studies are complex in their own right, and strategies to engage the local community in adopting new interventions are often fraught with considerable challenges. In order to maximise the impact of population health research, more explicit KT strategies need to be developed from the outset. We present four propositions, arising from our work in developing a KT framework for a population health study. These cover the need for an explicit theory-informed conceptual framework; formalizing collaborative approaches within the design; making explicit the roles of both the stakeholders and the researchers; and clarifying what counts as evidence. From our deliberations on these propositions, our own co-creating (co-KT) Framework emerged in which KT is defined as both a theoretical and practical framework for actioning the intent of researchers and communities to co-create, refine, implement and evaluate the impact of new knowledge that is sensitive to the context (values, norms and tacit knowledge) where it is generated and used. The co-KT Framework has five steps. These include initial contact and framing the issue; refining and testing knowledge; interpreting, contextualising and adapting knowledge to the local context; implementing and evaluating; and finally, the embedding and translating of new knowledge into practice.SummaryAlthough descriptions of how to incorporate KT into research designs are increasing, current theoretical and operational frameworks do not generally span a holistic process from knowledge co-creation to knowledge application and implementation within one project. Population health studies may have greater health impact when KT is incorporated early and explicitly into the research design. This, we argue, will require that particular attention be paid to collaborative approaches, stakeholder identification and engagement, the nature and sources of evidence used, and the role of the research team working with the local study community.

Highlights

  • Despite the considerable and growing body of knowledge translation (KT) literature, there are few methodologies sufficiently detailed to guide an integrated KT research approach for a population health study

  • This, we argue, will require that particular attention be paid to collaborative approaches, stakeholder identification and engagement, the nature and sources of evidence used, and the role of the research team working with the local study community

  • Drawing on our own attempts to create and make explicit an integrated KT approach into a large population health study [21], we argue that existing theoretical approaches for KT are not sufficiently detailed to help researchers and endusers co-create better solutions to healthcare challenges based on the best available, contextualized evidence

Read more

Summary

Discussion

The propositions that have shaped the arguments in this paper and have informed the development of the co-KT Framework are not new to the KT research community. Other practical challenges that go with such a broad and inclusive KT approach include managing community expectations; managing the sheer volume of process data; managing timeframes; identifying priorities; and facilitating multiple perspectives These are partly the reasons we chose the engaged scholarship model as a theoretical base for the co-KT Framework. The KT process includes knowledge generation with stakeholders, knowledge refinement and transfer and knowledge utilization all in one unifying framework The need for such an approach is illustrated by identifying and addressing four core propositions as they informed and shaped our own experiences in a population health study. KP worked on the development of the co-KT Framework, undertook the literature review, co-wrote, refined and led the editing of multiple drafts of the paper She is responsible for implementing the co-KT strategy within the LINKIN project.

Background
Woolf SH
29. Bandura A
34. Bate P: Changing the Culture of a Hospital

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.