Abstract

This study investigates knowledge of both syntax and verbal morphology by L2 English classroom learners with L1 Japanese in affirmative sentences with VP-adverbs (e.g., She usually eats breakfast at nine2). It proposes that the findings are consistent with the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (Lardiere, 2008, 2009) which the Full Transfer Full Access Hypothesis underlies3. Results are obtained from an elicited production task: for written data with 90 junior high school students (12-15 years old) and 30 university students (19-20 years old), as well as for spoken data with 12 junior high school students (12-13 years old). It is observed that the pattern of use of verb forms is different from that found in other L2 English studies. The key differences are: (1) high omission of copula is in copula is+adverb contexts; (2) two kinds of commission error where tense/aspect forms replace each other. It is argued that such variability in verbal morphology could be accounted for by the differences in the processes and conditions by which relevant morphosyntactic and semantic features are assembled between L1 and L2, which is consistent with the key claim of the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis.

Highlights

  • There has been considerable debate over what the sources of morphological variability are in L2 acquisition

  • This study aims to explain L1 Japanese learners’ variability in the production of verbal morphology, applying Lardiere’s new approach which focuses on L2 speakers’ failure to re-assemble morphosyntactic and semantic features into L2 lexical items in a target-like way

  • The findings suggest that the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis could explain Japanese learners’ systematic variability in: (1) the omission of copula is in copula is+adverb contexts; (2) two kinds of commission error where tense/aspect forms replace each other

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been considerable debate over what the sources of morphological variability are in L2 acquisition. A number of generative L2 studies have reported that L2 learners make omission and misuse/overuse errors in the production of inflectional morphology, regardless of differences in age, L1 (first language) background, and L2 (second language) proficiency. This study aims to explain L1 Japanese learners’ variability in the production of verbal morphology, applying Lardiere’s new approach which focuses on L2 speakers’ failure to re-assemble morphosyntactic and semantic features into L2 lexical items in a target-like way. The findings suggest that the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis could explain Japanese learners’ systematic variability in: (1) the omission of copula is in copula is+adverb contexts; (2) two kinds of commission error where tense/aspect forms replace each other

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call