Abstract

A key dimension of our current era is Big Data, the rapid rise in produced data and information; a key frustration is that we are nonetheless living in an age of ignorance, as the real knowledge and understanding of people does not seem to be substantially increasing. This development has critical consequences, for example it limits the ability to find and apply effective solutions to pressing environmental and socioeconomic challenges. Here, we propose the concept of “knowledge in the dark”—or short: dark knowledge—and outline how it can help clarify key reasons for this development: ( i) production of biased, erroneous, or fabricated data and information; ( ii) inaccessibility and ( iii) incomprehensibility of data and information; and ( iv) loss of previous knowledge. Even in the academic realm, where financial interests are less pronounced than in the private sector, several factors lead to dark knowledge, that is they inhibit a more substantial increase in knowledge and understanding. We highlight four of these factors—loss of academic freedom, research biases, lack of reproducibility, and the Scientific tower of Babel—and offer ways to tackle them, for example establishing an international court of arbitration for research and developing advanced tools for research synthesis.

Highlights

  • The quote from John Naisbitt, “we are drowning in information but starved for knowledge” (Naisbitt 1982, p. 24), is more applicable today than ever before

  • We highlight four of these factors—loss of academic freedom, research biases, lack of reproducibility, and the Scientific tower of Babel—and offer ways to tackle them, for example establishing an international court of arbitration for research and developing advanced tools for research synthesis

  • The concept of dark knowledge highly benefits from other points put forward by social scientists, for example the importance of considering research biases or that science has no monopoly on evidence, as data and information stemming from outside of science can be crucial

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The quote from John Naisbitt, “we are drowning in information but starved for knowledge” (Naisbitt 1982, p. 24), is more applicable today than ever before. The concept of dark knowledge highly benefits from other points put forward by social scientists, for example the importance of considering research biases (see below for details) or that science has no monopoly on evidence, as data and information stemming from outside of science can be crucial

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call