Abstract
PurposeIntensity‐Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), including its variations (including IMRT, Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT), and Tomotherapy), is a widely used and critically important technology for cancer treatment. It is a knowledge‐intensive technology due not only to its own technical complexity, but also to the inherently conflicting nature of maximizing tumor control while minimizing normal organ damage. As IMRT experience and especially the carefully designed clinical plan data are accumulated during the past two decades, a new set of methods commonly termed knowledge‐based planning (KBP) have been developed that aim to improve the quality and efficiency of IMRT planning by learning from the database of past clinical plans. Some of this development has led to commercial products recently that allowed the investigation of KBP in numerous clinical applications. In this literature review, we will attempt to present a summary of published methods of knowledge‐based approaches in IMRT and recent clinical validation results.MethodsIn March 2018, a literature search was conducted in the NIH Medline database using the PubMed interface to identify publications that describe methods and validations related to KBP in IMRT including variations such as VMAT and Tomotherapy. The search criteria were designed to have a broad scope to capture relevant results with high sensitivity. The authors filtered down the search results according to a predefined selection criteria by reviewing the titles and abstracts first and then by reviewing the full text. A few papers were added to the list based on the references of the reviewed papers. The final set of papers was reviewed and summarized here.ResultsThe initial search yielded a total of 740 articles. A careful review of the titles, abstracts, and eventually the full text and then adding relevant articles from reviewing the references resulted in a final list of 73 articles published between 2011 and early 2018. These articles described methods for developing knowledge models for predicting such parameters as dosimetric and dose‐volume points, voxel‐level doses, and objective function weights that improve or automate IMRT planning for various cancer sites, addressing different clinical and quality assurance needs, and using a variety of machine learning approaches. A number of articles reported carefully designed clinical studies that assessed the performance of KBP models in realistic clinical applications. Overwhelming majority of the studies demonstrated the benefits of KBP in achieving comparable and often improved quality of IMRT planning while reducing planning time and plan quality variation.ConclusionsThe number of KBP‐related studies has been steadily increasing since 2011 indicating a growing interest in applying this approach to clinical applications. Validation studies have generally shown KBP to produce plans with quality comparable to expert planners while reducing the time and efforts to generate plans. However, current studies are mostly retrospective and leverage relatively small datasets. Larger datasets collected through multi‐institutional collaboration will enable the development of more advanced models to further improve the performance of KBP in complex clinical cases. Prospective studies will be an important next step toward widespread adoption of this exciting technology.
Highlights
Radiation therapy is a widely adopted and effective cancer treatment that leverages highly advanced and complex technologies
We note that the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) technology has led to a number of different implementations in recent years including Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Tomotherapy
We identify Dose-volume histogram (DVH) point metrics, such as D35 or V65, along this approximate base DVH curve and display the differences (KBP-Clinical) in these metrics as displacements along respective directions to illustrate how well various knowledge-based planning (KBP) methods compare with the original clinical plans
Summary
Radiation therapy is a widely adopted and effective cancer treatment that leverages highly advanced and complex technologies. 46 (6), June 2019 0094-2405/2019/46(6)/2760/16 therapy (IMRT), physicians have a tremendous opportunity to maximize cancer control while minimizing toxicity to normal organs. Achieving this inherently contradicting goal using IMRT requires significant knowledge, experience, and time due to the complexity of technologies and the. We note that the IMRT technology has led to a number of different implementations in recent years including Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Tomotherapy. When it is listed together with VMAT and/or Tomotherapy, it refers to the original implementation
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have