Abstract

Objective To identify the knowledge base of doctors and nurses attending a trauma workshop. Methods: All participants of a trauma workshop were distributed a pre-test questionnaire with 30 type A questions. Questions on patient assessment and the management of airway, breathing and circulation were included. Scores were analysed with regard to the specialty and years since graduation. The difficulty and discrimination indices of individual question were analysed. Results 95 participants (33 were doctors) took the test. The participants were from the departments of surgery (41%), orthopaedics (24%), anaesthesia (20%) and emergency medicine (9%). The mean years from graduation of the participants were 3.22 (SD 3.77) for doctors and 3.56 (SD 6.06) for nurses. The mean score was 54% (SD 17%) for the whole group. The mean score of doctors was 68%, which was significantly higher than the nurses' score of 46%. (P<0.001) The mean score of Emergency Department doctors (82%) was highest among the four groups but the differences were not statistically significant. Non-surgical trainees (anaesthesia, emergency medicine) had statistically significant better scores than surgical trainees (surgery, orthopaedics, neurosurgery) in airway (p = 0.02) and breathing (p = 0.03) There were no statistically significant differences among the four doctor groups in the other sub-scores. For the doctors, only 3 questions had a correct response rate of less than 40%. On the contrary, for the nurse group, 13 questions attracted a correct response rate of less than 40%. Conclusions A pre-test was useful in helping us understand more about the knowledge base of different groups of participants.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.