Abstract

PurposeThe study purposes were to investigate the knowledge, attitude and practice of pesticide use and to determine the levels of serum cholinesterase among rice farmers in Nakhon Nayok province, Thailand.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional study was carried out in communities in Nakhon Nayok Province, Thailand. Multistage random sampling was employed, selecting one person per each rice farmer household. Data was collected from 188 rice farmers using a structured face-to-face interview questionnaire. A reactive-paper finger-blood test was used to determine SChE levels. Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between the practice of pesticide use and SChE levels.FindingsThe results indicated that the rice farmers had a fairly good knowledge and a neutral attitude toward the practice of pesticide use. Most of the respondents had a fairly proper practice of pesticide use. However, serum cholinesterase levels of the farmers were unsafe and risky. It signified that 68.1% of the farmers had a health risk from using pesticides. The prevalence of abnormal SChE levels among rice farmers with improper use was significantly higher than that among rice farmers who had a proper use.Research limitations/implicationsThe result provided a guideline for operational planning and control and prevention of health effects from pesticides use in farmers or other agriculturists who use pesticides in cultivation.Practical implicationsConcerned local agencies especially health-related agencies are able to conduct a training to educate and build safety awareness including monitoring continuously the safety behaviors toward pesticides use. It can be implemented by establishing leaders from health promoting hospitals led by village health volunteers, community leaders and participation from farmers to collaboratively monitor proper use of pesticides beginning with health surveillance in the abnormal SChE group to be screened for pesticide exposure every six months or one year.Social implicationsFarmers gained knowledge and understanding of pesticides use and used it properly, which resulted in a reduction of pesticide residues in body as well as in the environment. In addition, the government policy should legislate measures for related agencies to promote proper use of pesticides. For instance, Department of Agriculture, Minister of Agriculture and Cooperatives should regularly supervise, monitor and inspect the production and distribution of pesticides in local shops and also systematically encourage agriculturists to adopt using pesticides that are less harmful.Originality/valueHaving knowledge, understanding and proper practices toward pesticides use, farmers can reduce health effects of pesticides use in themselves and family members.

Highlights

  • Pesticides are widely used for rice farming in Thailand

  • This study found that the prevalence of abnormal Serum cholinesterase level (SChE) levels among rice farmers with improper use was significantly higher than that among rice farmers who followed proper usage practices

  • The results of this study indicated that rice farmers were at risk of receiving pesticide residues into the body, which could be the result of a lack of understanding by farmers toward pesticide use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pesticides are widely used for rice farming in Thailand. Statistics from 2007 to 2017 show that the import of pesticides into Thailand has been continuously increasing each year (164,538 tons in 2007 and 198,317 tons in 2017) [1]. Pesticides can be used freely by rice farmers, but cases of improper use can affect the health of the users, communities and the environment. As a result of inefficient pesticide use and management, people’s long-term health can be affected. Prevalent symptoms are related to agricultural tasks in the paddy fields among rice farmers. The main symptoms experienced by farmers included a dry throat and cramp following the spraying and mixing of pesticides [2]. The reported illness data was lower than the actual data due to incomplete research and continuity of reporting [3]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call