Abstract

Background: The complication rate of circumcision in medical settings is between 0.4% and 2.0%. Circumcision accidents constituted 2.0% of urological emergencies at the Yaoundé Central Hospital. Aim: To assess the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices of general practitioners on circumcision and its complications in Central Region District Hospitals. Population and Methods: We conducted a multicenter descriptive cross-sectional study the CAP (Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices) type. Which took place from March 9 to June 30, 2021 (16 weeks). We included 138 physicians. The variables collected were: socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge about circumcision and its complications, attitudes towards circumcision and its complications, practices towards circumcision and its complications. Results: In our study, the median age of the study population was 29 years, the sex ratio (M/F) was 0.8. The median ideal age to perform circumcision was 12 months. In our study, 94.9% of general practitioners clearly identified bleeding disorders as a contraindication for circumcision. The material needed to be used to perform a circumcision was ignored by 81.2% of general practitioners. The global knowledge assessment showed that 68.9% of participants had unsatisfactory knowledge about circumcision and its complications. Before circumcision, 91.3% general practitioners first recommended effective disinfection of the operating field, and 83.3% used sterile equipment. Faced with a hemorrhage, 61.6% of general practitioners proposed surgical exploration in the face of rebellious bleeding. 60.2% of general practitioners had bad attitudes towards circumcision and its complications. In our study, 49.2% of the general practitioners questioned did not know the normal procedure for performing a circumcision. Forty-one (29.7%) general practitioners had never performed a circumcision. The median occurrence of a complication during circumcision was 2 times. Bleeding was the most common early postoperative complication (89.2%) in general practitioner practice during circumcision. Conclusion: The majority of general practitioners have not received formal education on circumcision.

Highlights

  • In its most common form, the term circumcision designates the total or partial removal of the foreskin [1]

  • The material needed to be used to perform a circumcision was ignored by 81.2% of general practitioners

  • In order to establish a framework for better training of people empowered to perform circumcision; in order to establish a framework for a better training of people authorized to perform circumcision, we carried out this study in order to assess the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices of general practitioners on circumcision and its complications in Central Region District Hospitals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In its most common form, the term circumcision (posthectomy) designates the total or partial removal of the foreskin [1]. In order to establish a framework for better training of people empowered to perform circumcision; in order to establish a framework for a better training of people authorized to perform circumcision, we carried out this study in order to assess the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices of general practitioners on circumcision and its complications in Central Region District Hospitals. Aim: To assess the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices of general practitioners on circumcision and its complications in Central Region District Hospitals. Bleeding was the most common early postoperative complication (89.2%) in general practitioner practice during circumcision. Conclusion: The majority of general practitioners have not received formal education on circumcision

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call