Abstract
Introduction: It is known that graduate students work with research data more intimately than their faculty mentors. Because of this, much data management education is geared toward this population. However, student learning has predominantly been assessed through measures of satisfaction and attendance rather than through evaluating knowledge and skills acquired. This study attempts to advance assessment efforts by asking students to report their knowledge and practice changes before, immediately after, and 6 months following education. Method: Graduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and health science disciplines self-enrolled in an 8-week pilot data management program that used their research projects as the focus for learning. Three surveys were administered (pre-, post-, and 6 months following) to determine changes in students’ knowledge and practices regarding data management skills through self-assessment. The survey consisted of approximately 115 Likert-style questions and covered major aspects of the data life cycle. Results and Discussion: Overall, students increased their data management knowledge and improved their skills in all areas of the data life cycle. Students readily adopted practices for straightforward tasks such as determining storage and improving file naming. Students improved in but struggled with tasks that were more involved, such as sharing data and documenting code. For most of these practices, students consistently implemented them through the 6-month follow-up period. Conclusion: Impact of data management education lasts significantly beyond immediate instruction. In-depth assessment of student knowledge and practices indicates in which areas this education is effective and in which areas it needs further support. It is likely that this effect is due to the program length and focus on implementation.
Highlights
It is known that graduate students work with research data more intimately than their faculty mentors
The author described an approach to data management curriculum that was novel, relative to the literature, in three respects: by framing instruction content in three themes that highlight interdependencies between data management practices, by centering all active learning activities on students’ research projects, and by using a flipped classroom to give students time for implementing what they learned into their own research projects (Griffin, 2020)
Program participants were restricted to students in STEM or health science disciplines who were in a graduate-level program working on original research
Summary
It is known that graduate students work with research data more intimately than their faculty mentors. This study attempts to advance assessment efforts by asking students to report their knowledge and practice changes before, immediately after, and 6 months following education. Three surveys were administered (pre-, post-, and 6 months following) to determine changes in students’ knowledge and practices regarding data management skills through self-assessment. Students improved in but struggled with tasks that were more involved, such as sharing data and documenting code. For most of these practices, students consistently implemented them through the 6-month follow-up period. This paper follows that work and analyzes the changes in students’ knowledge and practices up to 6 months after completing the data management program
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.