Abstract

BackgroundRepresenting one's own body is often viewed as a basic form of self-awareness. However, little is known about structural representations of the body in the brain.Methods and FindingsWe developed an inter-manual version of the classical “in-between” finger gnosis task: participants judged whether the number of untouched fingers between two touched fingers was the same on both hands, or different. We thereby dissociated structural knowledge about fingers, specifying their order and relative position within a hand, from tactile sensory codes. Judgments following stimulation on homologous fingers were consistently more accurate than trials with no or partial homology. Further experiments showed that structural representations are more enduring than purely sensory codes, are used even when number of fingers is irrelevant to the task, and moreover involve an allocentric representation of finger order, independent of hand posture.ConclusionsOur results suggest the existence of an allocentric representation of body structure at higher stages of the somatosensory processing pathway, in addition to primary sensory representation.

Highlights

  • Knowledge about the physical structure of our own body is a basic form of self-awareness

  • Our results suggest the existence of an allocentric representation of body structure at higher stages of the somatosensory processing pathway, in addition to primary sensory representation

  • We investigate how somatosensory codes become connected to body structure representation (BSR), by testing knowledge about tactile stimulation of the fingers in the absence of vision

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge about the physical structure of our own body is a basic form of self-awareness. Notably touch, code basic features of sensory events at the skin, such as intensity and frequency These are represented in the somatotopic map of primary somatosensory cortex, which allows stimuli to be localised on the continuous sheet of the body surface. These primary representations do not contain structural information about the size and number of body parts themselves. The SI representation of the skin sheet does not respect the body’s true proportions, and decays rapidly in less than 1 second in the absence of sensory input [1,2] These properties reflect the needs of online sensory processing, but make them unsuitable for representing the body itself. Little is known about structural representations of the body in the brain

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.