Abstract

Atherosclerosis remains a leading killer of men and women. It is associated with reduced blood flow, progressive endothelial dysfunction and vascular remodeling. Preventing pathologic endothelial changes is crucial for stopping the disease. Transient receptor potential cation channels (TRPV4) play a key role in endothelial responses to shear stress and local mediators by controlling dynamic endothelial Ca2+ signals. In the current study, we assessed the specific impact of endothelial TRPV4 channels on carotid artery function in both wild type (WT) control and endothelial‐specific TRPV4 knockout transgenic mice (KO). Following tissue harvest, carotid arteries were cut into rings for Isometric force myography. Depolarization‐induced contractions (60 mM KCl) were larger in KO than WT arteries (1.14 ± 0.14 mN vs. 0.52 ± 0.08 mN, P<0.0005, N=6) and a similar trend was noted for contractions induced by the α1 adrenergic receptor agonist phenylephrine (0.68 ± 0.12 mN vs. 0.43 ± 0.08 mN, P<0.1, N=6). The calculated EC50 indicated no significant difference (1.7×10−7 vs 1.5×10−7 M, n=6) in phenylephrine sensitivity. Net relaxation to acetylcholine was increased in KO vs. WT but EC50 values were not significantly different (5.5×10−7 vs 5.9×10−7, n=6). Using confocal imaging, endothelial Ca2+ was evaluated in carotid artery segments that were cut open longitudinally. The dynamic Ca2+ events that drive endothelium dependent vasorelaxation were altered in KO vs. WT arteries, exhibiting a lower frequency of these events but also events with larger mean amplitude and duration. A carotid artery partial ligation model was used to mimic the low flow predicted with atherosclerosis. Following 2 weeks of reduced flow, KO arteries demonstrated enhanced contractility and impaired ACh‐induced relaxation compared to similarly ligated WT arteries. Overall, our findings suggest that loss of endothelial TRPV4 channels inherently augments vasoconstriction and exacerbates endothelial dysfunction under conditions of chronic low flow.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call