Abstract
SUMMARY: The impact of yellow-legged gulls on Audouin’s gulls was studied by means of observations from a blind, at the Ebro Delta, the Chafarinas Islands and the Columbretes Islands colonies, during different stages of Audouin’s Gulls breeding cycle. The rates of predation (upon eggs and chicks) and kleptoparasitism (aerial and on courtship and chick-feeding regurgitates) were recorded to evaluate this impact. Kleptoparasitism and predation rates recorded at the three colonies may be considered low when compared with similar studies dealing with other gull species. It seems that interactions did not represent a threat to the population dynamics of Audouin’s Gulls in any of the three colonies. The highest rates of aerial kleptoparasitism, courtship feeding and chick mortality were recorded at the Columbretes Islands, and the lowest at the Ebro Delta. The ratio of the number of yellow-legged gulls to the number of Audouin’s gulls seems to influence the rate of disturbances. Food availability was also likely to play an important role in the number of interactions, which increased when food was in shorter supply. The study at the Ebro Delta and Chafarinas Islands was restricted to some subcolonies and hence results may not be necessarily representative of the entire colonies. The existence of some yellow-legged gull individuals specialised as predators was recorded. Finally, we discuss the suitability of several conservation measures commonly applied in colonies where both species breed syntopically.
Highlights
Interference competition occurs when one individual actively interferes with another individual’s access to a resource
Aerial and courtshipfeeding kleptoparasitism were significantly higher at Columbretes (Kruskall-Wallis χ22 = 8.34, p = 0.015; χ22 = 6.23, p = 0.044 respectively)
Chickfeeding kleptoparasitism was not significantly different between colonies (χ22 = 1.29, p = 0.525), rates were very low in all three colonies (Table 1)
Summary
Interference competition occurs when one individual actively interferes with another individual’s access to a resource. These interactions may be intraspecific or interspecific, can affect individual fitness and are common among birds, especially during the breeding season (Ricklefs and Miller, 2000). The subordinate species have developed defensive-avoidance responses of different intensity against their would-be kleptoparasites and predators (Burger and Gochfeld, 1988; 1992; Shealer and Burger, 1992; Cavanagh and Griffin, 1993; Le. Corre and Jouventin, 1997). These behaviours include alarm calls or mobbing against the intruder, both at the individual and local population levels
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.