Abstract
The practice of Shari‘a Court, especially rahn contracts in the form of standard clauses, still have a number of problems, including the norms of the contents of the contract. This study discusses first, whether the norms in the contents of the rahn contract on Sharia Pawnshop (pegadian Syariah) are in accordance with the provisions of Islamic law. Second, the urgency of notary involvement in the formulation of the Sharia pawnshop rahn contract clause in an effort to guarantee consumer protection. The methodology used in this research is a normative study with secondary data sources derived from legal materials, with a statutory and conceptual approach. This research concludes: first, the norm contained in the contents of the rahn contract on Sharia Pawnshop is not in accordance with the provisions of Islamic law because it contains the invalid (fasid) conditions of a contract. Second, the need for the involvement of a Notary Public to safeguard any predetermined rules regarding rahn contracts to be carried out, as well as efforts to ensure legal protection for consumers to secure the position between rahin and murtahin for it to become balanced for the rahn contract clause to be based on justice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.