Abstract

In recent years, the usage of unmanned aerial systems has become more and more mainstream. As the technology has advanced, so has the regulations around them. The rules presented in Federal Aviation Regulation Part 107 allow their usage in a safe and responsible way. However, the many rules impede their potential to an extent. Part of flying unmanned aerial systems is getting 107 certified. This will cost over $100 and will take a significant amount of studying for newcomers to the field. Their advanced and complex electrical systems contribute to high prices. A Sentera PHX system can cost upwards of $10,000. Such costs can prevent their usage for startups or small businesses. These are all challenges in unmanned aerial systems. This isn't the only way to obtain aerial photography, however. Kite aerial photography is a possible remedy. This kind of photography is using kites with cameras attached to take aerial photos. The legislation around kites (Part 101) is far less restrictive than 107. For kites, there is no requirement for registration or certification. Though they lack the complicated electronics, they can compensate with lower costs. Though they are reliant on wind, they can have potentially loiter for hours in the right conditions. This paper will evaluate the usage of kite aerial photography in conjunction with unmanned aerial systems. It will compare safety, regulations, cost, and performance. Kites are not a replacement for unmanned aerial systems, but they could prove to be a very helpful supplement in the proper context.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call