Kissing Viabahn VBX stent graft reconstruction of thoracic central veins for management of superior vena cava syndrome

Abstract

ObjectiveIn the present study, we evaluated the technical and clinical outcomes of thoracic central vein reconstruction for superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome using kissing Viabahn VBX stent grafts (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). MethodsAll adult patients with SVC syndrome who had undergone attempted bilateral brachiocephalic vein-to-SVC reconstruction using kissing VBX stent grafts at an academic hospital between August 2019 and February 2021 were reviewed. The technical results, adverse events, imaging follow-up findings, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patency over time was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. ResultsA total of 28 patients (16 women and 12 men; mean age, 52.0 years) constituted the study cohort. Of the 28 patients, 17 (60.7%) had had benign and 11 (39.3%) malignant etiologies. The presenting symptoms included neck swelling (n = 17; 60.7%), bilateral upper extremity swelling (n = 15; 53.6%), dyspnea (n = 7; 25%), unilateral upper extremity swelling (n = 4; 14.3%), and dysphagia (n = 1; 3.6%). SVC reconstruction with VBX stent grafts in a kissing configuration was successfully completed in 27 of the 28 patients (96.4%). Four major adverse events were noted in the benign etiology subgroup (23.5%), including intraprocedural hemopericardium (n = 3) and delayed pneumothorax (n = 1). Of the 28 patients, 27 (96.4%) had experienced resolution of their presenting symptoms. The mean clinical follow-up for the living patients was 358.8 ± 77.2 days (range, 78-645 days). The mean imaging follow-up for the living patients was 272.6 ± 91 days (range, 26-594 days). The primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates at 12 months were 71.8%, 88.8%, and 100%, respectively. ConclusionsFor the management of SVC syndrome, thoracic central vein reconstruction with kissing VBX stent grafts was feasible with a high rate of symptom resolution and acceptable patency. However, this technique should not be recommended for those with benign SVC syndrome owing to the high risk of cardiac tamponade.