Abstract

The objective of this work was to compare the quality of parameter estimation from experiments with protein hydrolysis of fish muscle carried out following a traditional versus D-optimal design of experiments. Traditional design was done from hydrolysis experiments using the rapid titration method, from which a large number of data points was obtained and made available for parameter estimation. D-optimal design is recommended under conditions when it would not be possible to use rapid titration with analytical tools. Such conditions would make it necessary to reduce the number of samples that would need to be taken as well as the error and variance in the estimated parameters needed for the kinetic model. Results have shown that D-optimal and traditional designs of experiments obtained accurate and reliable estimates of kinetic model parameters, with a great difference in the number of data points between both types of design: 18 points in traditional and 3 points in D-optimal design. Nevertheless, a few number of observations in D-optimal design impacted negatively the confidence interval because of a low degree of freedom. Confidence intervals ranging from 7.8% to 87% of the parameters values were obtained with D-optimal design method in contrast with traditional design where confidence intervals ranged from 6.2% to 15% of the parameters values. It is estimated that combining the advantages of both types of design will result in an optimal experimental design in terms of reliability, accuracy, and costs saving of analysis. This would be done by determining the number of observations required to achieve an appropriate confidence interval (about six or more experimental points) and, then, a selection of the best experimental points of a curve of hydrolysis by D-optimal design.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call