Abstract
Map-view restoration of the frontal part of the French Alps was done in order to test two hypotheses about the propagation of deformation. We discussed two models of the ‘rooting’ of the Jura-Molasse basal detachment either along basement thrusts beneath the External Basement Massifs (EBM-rooting model) or along basal thrusts of the Subalpine Chains above the External Basement Massifs (SAC-rooting model). The different sequences of deformation are described for the two models with their kinematics and geochronological constraints. The geochronological data available on the uplift timing of the External Basement Massif are then discussed. Due to their range of uncertainty, geochronological data on the exhumation of the External Basement Massifs are not decisive to discriminate between the two models. Using either the maximum or the minimum age in the range of their uncertainty allows fitting the timing constraints of both models. Interpretation of map-view restoration reveals a weakness of the EBM-rooting model linked to the fact that a sharp virgation is predicted between the two main cross sections. This does not discard this model as such virgation may be linked to paleostratigraphic or tectonic effects but this must be taken into account when using this model. Structural data are also discussed as field geology on the mechanism of uplifting of the external basement massif or geophysical data as deep seismic lines shot in the frame of the ECORS and NRP20 research programs. Such data favor one or the other model without discarding one of them. We conclude that, with the available data, both models seem possible and that the less popular one (SAC-rooting model) shows the more coherent restoration field, the reason why we favor it at the present time.
Highlights
Understanding the propagation of deformation in an orogen on a geological time scale is a major challenge for geoscientists
Whereas the balancing of a single cross-section usually does not bring enough constraints to determine the propagation of deformation, map-view restorations can bring some compelling evidence to determine the kinematic links between tectonic units
Restoration is usually applied to regional cross-sections (Dahlstrom 1969) assuming that deformation took place in the plane of section but it can be applied in map view to generate palinspastic maps
Summary
Understanding the propagation of deformation in an orogen on a geological time scale is a major challenge for geoscientists. The regional study of structures can lead to different interpretations about the kinematic relationship between tectonic units. This is the case in compressive settings where deformation may propagate along blind thrusts, i.e. thrusts that do not break to the surface. The lack of subsurface data often makes it difficult to determine the kinematic link between the different tectonic units. In this context, the restoration of geological structures Dahlstrom (1969) allows one to quantify deformations and test the strain compatibility between tectonic units, including blind thrusts. Since the displacement accommodated by tectonic units is not uniform along-strike, displacement transfers from one tectonic unit to another should vary along-strike and be an indication of a kinematic link between
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.