Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the kinematic factors for the cause and effect of hitting hurdles during the initial phase of a 110-m hurdle run. Nine experienced male hurdlers participated in this study (body height: 1.74 ± 0.04 m, body mass: 67.4 ± 5.9 kg, age: 20.2 ± 1.4 years, personal best: 15.21 ± 0.47 s, seasonal best: 15.33 ± 0.55 s). Hurdlers undertook 12 trials of the initial phase of hurdling from the start to the second hurdle landing. Dual-sided sagittal plane motion was obtained from images from two high-speed cameras operating at 120 Hz. One ‘hit’ trial which had the largest horizontal displacement of markers fixed on the hurdle and one ‘non-hit’ trial which had the fastest time of hurdle clearance were extracted for each participant. Kinematic variables were compared between the two trials. Significantly lower height of the whole-body centre of mass at the take-off was found as a possible cause of hitting hurdles, caused by insufficient swing-up of the lead leg thigh. In contrast to conventional understanding, take-off velocity, take-off distance and the take-off angle were comparable between the ‘hit’ trial and ‘non-hit’ trial. Regarding the effect of hitting hurdles, it was observed that running velocity during hurdling was not substantially reduced. However, several characteristic movements were identified that might induce inefficient motion to re-accelerate running velocity during the following landing steps.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.