Abstract

The interruption of rehabilitation activities caused by the COVID-19 lockdown has significant health negative consequences for the population with physical disabilities. Thus, measuring the range of motion (ROM) using remotely taken photographs, which are then sent to specialists for formal assessment, has been recommended. Currently, low-cost Kinect motion capture sensors with a natural user interface are the most feasible implementations for upper limb motion analysis. An active range of motion (AROM) measuring system based on a Kinect v2 sensor for upper limb motion analysis using Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scoring is described in this paper. Two test groups of children, each having eighteen participants, were analyzed in the experimental stage, where upper limbs’ AROM and motor performance were assessed using FMA. Participants in the control group (mean age of 7.83 ± 2.54 years) had no cognitive impairment or upper limb musculoskeletal problems. The study test group comprised children aged 8.28 ± 2.32 years with spastic hemiparesis. A total of 30 samples of elbow flexion and 30 samples of shoulder abduction of both limbs for each participant were analyzed using the Kinect v2 sensor at 30 Hz. In both upper limbs, no significant differences (p < 0.05) in the measured angles and FMA assessments were observed between those obtained using the described Kinect v2-based system and those obtained directly using a universal goniometer. The measurement error achieved by the proposed system was less than ±1° compared to the specialist’s measurements. According to the obtained results, the developed measuring system is a good alternative and an effective tool for FMA assessment of AROM and motor performance of upper limbs, while avoiding direct contact in both healthy children and children with spastic hemiparesis.

Highlights

  • Introduction published maps and institutional affilEffective public health and social measures are fundamental strategies to combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)

  • There was no significant difference between the manual Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) measurement and FMA with natural user interface (NUI) (p < 0.05)

  • The error of the measurement system with NUI is less than ±1◦

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction published maps and institutional affilEffective public health and social measures are fundamental strategies to combat Coronavirus (COVID-19). Avoiding crowds and maintaining a physical distance from others is essential to reduce the rate of infection [1]. The negative consequences of the interruption of rehabilitation activities are significant for the population with physical disabilities [2]. The. World Health Organization reported that more than 15% of the world’s population has a physical limitation, such as cerebral palsy (CP) [3]. System (GMFCS) scale is essential for determining physical movement skills in patients with CP, e.g., the ability to sit up [4]. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) scale determines fine motor skills, of the hand, e.g., activities that the patient can perform daily, from combing hair to tying shoelaces [5]. The effectiveness of cerebral palsy treatment depends on many factors, including optimal and systematic monitoring of patients’ progress [6].

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.