KG 4/2015: A randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label phase III clinical trial of GV1001 with gemcitabine/capecitabine in previous untreated, eotaxin-high patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Abstract

4020 Background: In the TeloVac study, GV1001 with Gemcitabine/capecitabine (G/C) did not show increased overall survival (OS) than G/C in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). But cytokine examination suggested high serum eotaxin level may predict improved survivals in pts received GV1001 with G/C. This phase III trial was designed to assess the efficacy of GV1001 with G/C for previous untreated eotaxin-high Korean pts with advanced PDA. Methods: Eligible pts with histologically proven locally advanced and metastatic PDA (except peritoneal carcinomatosis), age > 18 years, and ECOG PS 0–2 were recruited. Pts were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either G/C or G/C with GV1001 (G/C/GV). All pts receiving G/C/GV were with high serum eotaxin level (≥81.02 ng/mL), and the pts receiving G/C were randomly assigned again (1:1) to eotaxin-high and eotaxin-low pts. Study was designed according to Korean MFDS guidance for approval of clinical trial. G/C treatment included G (1000 mg/m2, 30 min IVF, D 1, 8, & 15) and C (830 mg/m2 BID for 21 days per month (m). G/C/GV treatment included an intradermal injection of GM-CSF (75 μg) and GV1001 (0.56 mg; D 1, 3, & 5, once on week 2–4, & 6, then monthly thereafter) from the start of G/C. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), objective response rate, and safety. Survival data was analyzed using the copula graphic estimate method under dependent censoring. The response was independently assessed per RECIST v1.1. Under the one-sided significance level of 2.5% and to achieve the power of 80% of the statistical significance with the median OS difference from 7.9 to 14.9 m (HR = 0.53), 85 events and 118 registrations needed. Considering 20% drop-outs, 148 registrations were required. Results: Between Nov 2015 and Apr 2020, of 511 pts screened in 16 centers, eotaxin-high pts were identified as 34.7% (174 / 502 pts). 148 pts randomly assigned to G/C/GV (n = 75; all eotaxine-high) and G/C (n = 73; 37 eotaxine-high, 36 eotaxine-low). Median OS was significantly improved in the G/C/GV group with 11.3m [95% CI 8.6-14.0] than G/C group with 7.5 m [95% CI 5.1-10.0] (p = 0.021). Also, median TTP was significantly improved in the G/C/GV group (7.3 m [95% CI 5.0-9.7]) than in the G/C group (4.5 m [95% CI 3.2-5.8], p = 0.021). In other secondary endpoints, no statistical significance was confirmed between the two groups. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 49 pts (73.13%) vs. 58 pts (77.33%) in the G/C and G/C/GV group, without significant differences (p = 0.562). Conclusions: G/C/GV treatments significantly extend OS and TTP in advanced PDA than G/C, and specific safety-related issues had not been found. GV1001 should be considered as one of the options in PDA pts with high serum eotaxin levels. Clinical trial information: NCT02854072.