Abstract
This paper considers the confusion generated by the interpretations of Keynes's GENERAL THEORY. Drawing on the study of hermeneutics, it is argued that much of the confusion is caused by the adoption of presuppositions, often implicitly, about the nature of interpretation. Another contributory factor is the failure to distinguish between meaning as the aim of interpretation and significance as the aim of application. It is concluded that the existence of multiple interpretations should not be regarded as a problem but as evidence of the high reference power of Keynes's GENERAL THEORY through its ability to disclose different possible ways of understanding the macro economy. Copyright 1991 by Royal Economic Society.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
