Abstract
The current effluent standards emphasize on the removal of nutrients from sewage, and one solution is for establishments to install biological nutrient removal (BNR) technologies. However, there are several factors to be considered in installing or upgrading the technologies. Hence, the study utilizes two multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools to determine the important attributes and the optimal technology from the perspective of the academe, regulatory agency, and industry. Calibrated fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) calculates the relative importance of the three criteria (implementability, financial, and socio-environmental) and twelve sub-criteria. On the other hand, the grey relational analysis is used to calculate the performance of the four selected alternatives: 3-stage Bardenpho (A2O), 5-stage Bardenpho (5BP), sequencing batch reactor (SBR), and membrane bioreactor (MBR). Combining the results of calibrated FAHP and GRA provided the overall ranking of alternatives. Results showed that each sector prioritized different factors in the selection of the optimal BNR technology. The academe considers socio-environmental (0.43) as the most preferred criterion, while the regulatory agency and industry consider financial (0.36) and implementability (0.57), respectively. Overall, the three sectors agreed that the sequential batch reactor (SBR) is the optimal BNR technology (GRG = 0.69 - 0.79).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
