Abstract

A major challenge for biodiversity conservation is to mitigate the effects of future environmental change, such as land use, in important areas for biodiversity conservation. In the United States, recent conservation efforts by The Nature Conservancy and partners have identified and mapped the nation's Areas of Biodiversity Significance (ABS), representing the best remaining habitats for the full diversity of native species and ecosystems, and thus the most important and suitable areas for the conservation of native biodiversity. Our goal was to understand the potential consequences of future land use changes on the nation's ABS, and identify regions where ABS are likely to be threatened due to future land use expansion. For this, we used an econometric‐based model to forecast land use changes between 2001 and 2051 across the conterminous U.S. under alternative scenarios of future land use change. Our model predicted a total of ∼100,000 to 160,000 km2 of natural habitats within ABS replaced by urban, crop and pasture expansion depending on the scenario (5% to 8% habitat loss across the conterminous U.S.), with some regions experiencing up to 30% habitat loss. The majority of the most threatened ABS were located in the Eastern half of the country. Results for our different scenarios were generally fairly consistent, but some regions exhibited notable difference from the baseline under specific policies and changes in commodity prices. Overall, our study suggests that key areas for conserving United States' biodiversity are likely threatened by future land use change, and efforts trying to preserve the ecological and conservation values of ABS will need to address the potential intensification of human land uses.

Highlights

  • Land use change is one of the main causes of biodiversity loss and critical for conservation planning (Chapin et al 2000, Fleishman et al 2011)

  • We first describe the approach for identifying Areas of Biodiversity Significance (ABS) by The Nature Conservancy; the land use model and scenarios of future land use change used in this study; and the way that we use the ABS data and land use model to pursue four research objectives

  • Our study revealed that future land use change may pose important threats to conserve biodiversity in the United States because it may replace substantial amounts of natural habitats within Areas of Biodiversity Significance (ABS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Land use change is one of the main causes of biodiversity loss and critical for conservation planning (Chapin et al 2000, Fleishman et al 2011). Evaluating future land use changes and their potential impacts on important areas for MARTINUZZI ET AL. Biodiversity is an important task, because it can help to identify probable threats to biodiversity as well as conservation opportunities, providing valuable information for land use planning, conservation strategies, and policy making (Pressey et al 2007, Moilanen et al 2009, Radeloff et al 2010). Understanding land use change is critical to mitigate the potential negative effects of climate change (Groves et al 2012). The location of future land use change matters, since some areas are more important for biodiversity conservation than others

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call