Abstract

Many companies attempt to obtain competitive advantage and achieve sustability in their business byestablishing strategic alliances with their customers. One of the most significant types of strategic alliance is KeyAccount Management (KAM). KAM is a systematic supplier initiated programme for managing strategicallyimportant customers in business-to-business (B2B) markets. However, the relationship-oriented perspective ofKAM has limited empirical examination, and most of the studies were mainly conducted in developed countriessuch as United States of America, Europe, East Asia, Africa, and Oceania. The aim of this paper is to reviewKAM literature since 1950s, and to identify its drivers and research challenges. The review found that KAM isevolved from Relationship Marketing (RM) and it involves the adoption of collaborative ways of managing keyaccount relationships as compared to traditional transactional practices to achieve an effective KAM relationship.The paper concludes that implementation of KAM could enhance performance of suppliers.

Highlights

  • Key Account Management (KAM) is a relationship oriented marketing management approach originating in the US to deal with key customers in Business-to-Business (B2B) markets (Wengler, Ehret, & Saab, 2006; Millman, 1996; McDonald, Millman, & Rogers, 1997; McDonald & Rogers, 1998; McDonald, 2000)

  • The importance of KAM in establishing long term business relationships between buyer and seller in B2B markets is extensively recognised in literature (Ojasalo, 2001; Homburg, Workman, & Jensen, 2002; Henneberg, Pardo, & Mouzas, 2005; Wengler, Ehret, & Saab, 2006; Ryals & Humphries, 2007; Davies & Ryals, 2014; Marcos-Cuevas, Natti, Palo, & Ryals, 2014)

  • This long term perspective of KAM lacks of appropriate empirical examination (Gounaris & Tzempelikos, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

KAM is a relationship oriented marketing management approach originating in the US to deal with key customers in Business-to-Business (B2B) markets (Wengler, Ehret, & Saab, 2006; Millman, 1996; McDonald, Millman, & Rogers, 1997; McDonald & Rogers, 1998; McDonald, 2000). This relationship-oriented perspective of KAM lacks appropriate empirical examination (Tzempelikos & Gounaris, 2013). KAM entails identifying and targeting key accounts by giving them special treatment in the areas of administration, marketing, and services

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call