Kewenangan Notaris Menjalani Jabatannya Pasca Putusan Pidana

Abstract

This research examines the authority of a notary to carry out their position. The problems formulated are first, the implementation of the Notary's authority to serve their position after the criminal verdict. Second, the authority of the Notary Supervisory Board in imposing sanctions on a Notary who has been sentenced to a crime. The research method used is a normative legal research method with a case approach from the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps and laws and regulations. The gathering of the legal material uses literature and interviews techniques, while the analysis uses the normative qualitative technique. The results of the study conclude that first, the authority of a Notary to serve their position after a criminal verdict on probation for 1 (one) year is to be able to practice again as a Notary after being released from their sentence, the Notary can exercise their authority in accordance with article 15 UUJN. Second, the Notary Supervisory Board has the authority to impose sanctions on notaries who have been sentenced to criminal convictions. Third, the Regional Supervisory Board can conduct an examination of the findings of a notary who has been convicted of a crime by the District Court as an effort to supervise and guide the Notary so that they will act in accordance with the law and not commit any more criminal acts and will be recommended to the Regional Supervisory Council to be given sanctions according to the applicable regulations