Abstract

Repeated time-to-event (RTTE) models are the preferred method to characterize the repeated occurrence of clinical events. Commonly used diagnostics for parametric RTTE models require representative simulations, which may be difficult to generate in situations with dose titration or informative dropout. Here, we present a novel simulation-free diagnostic tool for parametric RTTE models; the kernel-based visual hazard comparison (kbVHC). The kbVHC aims to evaluate whether the mean predicted hazard rate of a parametric RTTE model is an adequate approximation of the true hazard rate. Because the true hazard rate cannot be directly observed, the predicted hazard is compared to a non-parametric kernel estimator of the hazard rate. With the degree of smoothing of the kernel estimator being determined by its bandwidth, the local kernel bandwidth is set to the lowest value that results in a bootstrap coefficient of variation (CV) of the hazard rate that is equal to or lower than a user-defined target value (CVtarget). The kbVHC was evaluated in simulated scenarios with different number of subjects, hazard rates, CVtarget values, and hazard models (Weibull, Gompertz, and circadian-varying hazard). The kbVHC was able to distinguish between Weibull and Gompertz hazard models, even when the hazard rate was relatively low (< 2 events per subject). Additionally, it was more sensitive than the Kaplan-Meier VPC to detect circadian variation of the hazard rate. An additional useful feature of the kernel estimator is that it can be generated prior to model development to explore the shape of the hazard rate function.

Highlights

  • Pharmacometric models are increasingly used to characterize the repeated occurrence of clinical events

  • We developed and evaluated the kernel-based visual hazard comparison (kbVHC), a simulation-free diagnostic to evaluate the structural submodel of Repeated time-to-event (RTTE) models in a non-linear mixed-effect setting

  • The kbVHC is primarily intended as a diagnostic for RTTE models that relies on bootstrapping of the observed data to obtain a confidence interval of the non-parametric hazard rate, which is compared to the mean posthoc hazard of an RTTE model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pharmacometric models are increasingly used to characterize the repeated occurrence of clinical events. Repeated time-to-event (RTTE) modeling is theoretically superior to alternative methods like time-to-event, which only considers the first event, and count modeling, which treats the events as counts within time intervals [4]. The Kaplan-Meier visual predictive check (VPC) evaluates a model by comparing the observed and simulated Kaplan-Meier survival plots for every nth occurrence of an event [1,4]. Another example is a VPC as proposed by Plan et al in which observed and simulated events are discretized as counts within small time intervals [4].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.